Rob Seitelman ([info]seitelcrantz) wrote,
@ 2005-03-18 16:02:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Teri Schiavo
Not to beat a dead horse (too much), but before they were saying that this woman was a vegetable, now they're saying she's functioning at a low level, able to breathe and swallow on her own and responsive to familiar faces.

Congress wants her to come to the Hill as well.

This all seems pretty fucked up from my point of view. I thought she was in a coma. Her parents are talking about keeping her alive for 30-40 years on feeding tubes. But she's not in a coma. She has the brain power of an 11-12 month-old. So, you have to question it a little differently I think. What would happen if an infant required a feeding tube?



(Post a new comment)


[info]estrie
2005-03-19 09:45 pm UTC (link)
this isn't so much relevant, i don't think, and i don't meant to beat the dead horse either, but
at least babies have the potential to develop, grow, and, you know, that stuff.
on flickr, i've been following pictures of a baby that was born something like 25 or 26 weeks early = very premature. definately needed feeding tube :) but by 11 months old that's a bit late, probably. yet at 11 or 12 months, an infant is still devloping. ... though if an infant needed a feeding tube at 11 months it wouldn't be experiencing enough to learn enough to ever function.
just wanted to share those ideas :)

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…